FY-6/30/08 | FY-6/30/07 | FY-6/30/06 | |
Direct Public Support | 401,730 | 252,249 | 250,428 |
Program Service Revenue | 6,877,399 | 6,648,555 | 2,582,567 |
Membership Dues & Assessments | 186,300 | 184,500 | 183,300 |
Interest on Savings & Temp Cash Investments | 79,502 | 79,843 | 34,670 |
Total Revenue | 7,544,931 | 7,165,147 | 3,050,965 |
Program Services (Expenses) | 6,958,323 | 6,011,769 | 2,381,322 |
Management & General | 451,675 | 447,094 | 415,290 |
Fundrasising | 213,152 | 165,927 | 160,562 |
Total Expenses | 7,623,150 | 6,624,790 | 2,957,174 |
Excess of (Deficit) | -78,219 | 540,357 | 93,791 |
Net Assests of Fund Balances at Beginning of Year | 3,177,569 | 1,783,337 | 1,689,546 |
Other changes in net assests or fund balances | 0 | 853,875 | 0 |
Net Assests of Fund Balances at End of Year | 3,099,350 | 3,177,569 | 1,783,337 |
Kenneth Tilley (Exec Director) | 123,600 | 116,442 | 108,945 |
Contrib. to employee benefit plan/Deferred plans | 52,512 | 48,966 | 43,165 |
Robert Button (Asst. Director) | X | X | 25,986 |
Contrib. to employee benefit plan/Deferred plans | X | X | 11,488 |
Jim Garman (CFO) | 82,400 | 78,774 | 76,482 |
Contrib. to employee benefit plan/Deferred plans | 39,530 | 36,900 | 33,226 |
Tom Zimorski (Deputy Director) | 92,700 | 78,774 | 72,054 |
Contrib. to employee benefit plan/Deferred plans | 33,729 | 28,895 | 25,262 |
Joyce Sisson (Asst. Director) | 82,400 | 75,732 | 72,530 |
Contrib. to employee benefit plan/Deferred plans | 29,726 | 27,562 | 25,334 |
Bruce Patrick (Asst. Director) | X | 12,622 | 70,578 |
Contrib. to employee benefit plan/Deferred plans | X | 3,289 | 24,513 |
Hannah-Catherine Muro (Director of Develop) | 66,950 | 61,740 | 57,594 |
Contrib. to employee benefit plan/Deferred plans | 28,233 | 25,734 | 22,562 |
Tom Dolan (Asst. Director) | 72,100 | 34,826 | X |
Contrib. to employee benefit plan/Deferred plans | 26,886 | 8,045 | X |
Lisa Giles (Asst. Director) | 66,950 | 63,570 | 51,433 |
Contrib. to employee benefit plan/Deferred plans | 22,219 | 20,536 | 9,214 |
Lora Bickley (Office Mgr) | 57,680 | X | X |
Contrib. to employee benefit plan/Deferred plans | 14,949 | X | X |
Gross Receipts from Admission, merchandise sold or services performed, or furnishing of facilities in any activity that is related to the organization's charitable, etc, purpose : | |||
2006 | - 6,648,555 | ||
2005 | - 2,582,567 | ||
2004 | - 2,508,573 | ||
2003 | - 1,814,950 |
An informative Public Blog for 22601 since September 2009.
Winchester, VA
Everything posted will be researched thoroughly and be very much factual!
Very limited hearsay here with just the facts of the most recent information made available to The Pub!
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Virginia High School League Financial Highlights for FY-June 08, 07 and 06
There has always been interest in what type of revenue does the VHSL bring in each year. Well, The Pibbster's Pub is always more than happy to share information so that the citizenry can be more informed.
[Source: IRS990 that is open to the public for inspection]
Saturday, November 14, 2009
FBI knew of the Ft. Hood shooter and his views in Dec. 2008, but did nothing with it ... PC will get you every time ...
The Federal Bureau of Non-Investigation
On Monday, ABC News first reported that Fort Hood shooter Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan had reached out to al Qaeda associates prior to his attack. There were good reasons to speculate that one of these al Qaeda figures is Anwar al Awlaki -- an al Qaeda recruiter who acted as a “spiritual advisor” to two of the 9/11 hijackers. Awlaki preached at a mosque Hasan attended in 2001 and praised Hasan’s attack on his web site Monday morning.
It turns out that informed speculation was correct, according to the Associated Press and the New York Times. Beginning in December of last year, authorities found that Hasan communicated with Awlaki “10 to 20 times.” But no formal investigation was ever launched. Why?
http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/11/the_federal_bureau_of_noninves_1.asp#more
Friday, November 13, 2009
Council to honor FOIA regulations, Aug. 18 closed session violated meeting rules
Council to honor FOIA regulations
Aug. 18 closed session violated meeting rules
By Cynthia Cather Burton
The Winchester Star
WINCHESTER — A City Council panel has committed a procedural violation of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, according to Maria J.K. Everett, executive director of the Virginia Freedom of Information Advisory Council.
The council’s Finance and Administration Committee held a closed-session meeting Aug. 18 to discuss a memorandum of understanding drafted by Shenandoah University.
When it began the closed session, the committee cited the portion of the Freedom of Information Act that allows closed meetings to confer with legal counsel about a real estate matter.
Everett said the committee correctly cited the code section and the purpose for the closed session, but it failed to identify the subject of the special meeting.
During closed sessions, the public and news media are not allowed to be present.
If people are being “kicked out,” they have a right to know “some idea of the subject,” Everett said Thursday from her Richmond office. “It doesn’t have to be gruelingly specific ... but just a reference to real estate or legal advice is insufficient and a procedural violation of the law.”
The committee’s motion to move into a closed session should have included a subject, such as the joint venture with the university on projects, she offered as an example. “The subject is required.”
Without it, the public has no idea about the nature of the discussions that public officials have behind closed doors, Everett said.
The minutes from the Aug. 18 meeting, for instance, contain no references to the memorandum of understanding, making it difficult for the public to know when the topic was discussed by officials in closed session.
“They did violate the rights granted to the public and press under FOIA,” Everett said. “They are obligated to do it correctly, and they did not. They can be sued on that basis.”
City Council President Jeff Buettner, who attended the Aug. 18 meeting, said the council typically cites only the code section and purpose before going into a closed session, but does not state a subject.
“I think it’s fair to state that we probably haven’t been as specific as we should,” he said. “But it’s not because we’re trying to hide anything.”
Everett called the practice “an ignorance issue, more than anything.”
Buettner said the council acts on advice from its attorney. From now on, as much information as possible will be included in motions for closed sessions, he said, as long as it does not jeopardize the city government’s position on “any specific issues.”
City Attorney Anthony “Tony” Williams declined to comment, citing attorney-client privilege.
For the remaining story in The Winchester Star, following this link :
Council to honor FOIA regulations, Aug. 18 closed session violated meeting rules
Buettner explains decision to hike city attorney's salary nearly $20k
A special session of the Winchester Common Council was held on Tuesday, October 6, 2009 in the Council Chambers, Rouss City Hall. President Jeffrey Buettner called the meeting to order at 6:59 p.m.
PRESENT: President Jeff Buettner; Vice-Mayor Michael Butler; Councilors Evan Clark, John Hill, Milt McInturff, Les Veach and John Willingham; Vice-President Art Major; Mayor Elizabeth Minor (9)
PRESENT: President Jeff Buettner; Vice-Mayor Michael Butler; Councilors Evan Clark, John Hill, Milt McInturff, Les Veach and John Willingham; Vice-President Art Major; Mayor Elizabeth Minor (9)
The perception was that the local media was not present or could not stick around after this executive session on Tuesday, October 6, 2009 due to their respective deadlines.
• Motion to convene in Executive Session pursuant to §2.2-3711(A)(1) of the Code of Virginia to discuss a personnel matter regarding assignment, appointment, performance, and salaries of specific public appointees.
Councilor Willingham moved to convene in executive session. The motion was seconded then
unanimously approved by voice-vote.
At 7:01 p.m. President Buettner stated that executive session would begin after a five minute recess.
Upon returning at 7:44 p.m., council members approved a motion to return to open meeting and each member certified that only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act were discussed during the closed meeting, and that only those public business matters identified in the motion which convened the closed meeting were heard, discussed, or considered during the closed meeting.
A roll call vote was taken, the ayes and nays being recorded as shown below:
MEMBER VOTE
Councilor Buettner Aye
Councilor Butler Aye
Councilor Clark Aye
Councilor Hill Aye
Councilor Major Aye
Councilor McInturff Aye
Mayor Minor Aye
Councilor Veach Aye
Councilor Willingham Aye
Page 2 October 6, 2009
• President Buettner presented a motion to increase the City Attorney’s annual salary to $124,000. The motion was seconded by Councilor Willingham and then unanimously approved by voice-vote. President Buettner stated that Council would ask the City Manager to look at employee salaries throughout the City and would need to pay them competitively. During the next budget cycle, the other employees would be compensated.
A quote from a local reporter in response to this increase which the local media was not aware until someone from downtown notified The Pub on Wednesday, October 21, 2009 in return was shared with the local media outlets which produced a front page story in the NVD on Thursday, October 22nd. The Winchester Star ran a story on page B5 of the local section the same day.
The night I DIDN'T stick around after the "executive session" ... actually I think no one from the media stuck around. Keep in mind, this is NOT an election year for council.
All media reps who attended the Oct. 6 meeting left when council convened in closed session and no one returned.
The length of closed sessions are never known beforehand so media reps who face deadline issues often have to return to their offices in enough time to file stories. I can't say whether council realized everyone had left and THEN decided to act or if they would not have taken action were any of us still at the meeting.
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Valley Health may feel squeeze (The Winchester Star)
Valley Health may feel squeeze
By Rebecca Layne
The Winchester Star
November 11, 2009
Winchester — Health-care reform was the major topic among many discussed by Valley Health officials during their semi-annual meeting Tuesday.
Company Chairman Dixon Whitworth told the crowded room that a change is needed to sustain the viability of the nation’s health care.
He also spoke of the effect on Valley Health of possible cuts of $11 million to $12 million in Medicare reimbursements.
“The magnitude of such costs will have significant impact on our jobs and health-care services,” said Whitworth.
http://winchesterstar.com/pages/view/squeeze.html
Folks, the Pub has shared a different side of Valley Health System that displays a much healthier financial position than the masses of the regional community is informed about.
Please keep in mind, from years 2001 through 2005, the Winchester Medical Center profits made epic leaps and bounds with an jaw dropping 383%.
Wonder if Mr. Whitworth is trying to say that Valley Health will have to raise the "charges" on their services to overcome this revenue shortfall?
Valley Health has made epic strides in Excess of Revenue (Profits) since 2001
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
A new direction? Winchester flunks Engineering 101 (TheWinchesterStar)
A new direction?
Winchester flunks Engineering 101
By Michael Shea
While I suspect that additional traffic in Winchester was in part due to the glorious last gasp of summer, the condition demonstrated that government — at every level — is subject to the law of unintended consequences. Namely, by making Braddock and Cameron two-way, what was once a one-minute trip from Piccadilly to Handley Boulevard, now takes no less than six minutes.
The timing of the lights is set to ensure each is red upon arrival. The lines of cars at each light were no less than 10 deep, and just turning off Braddock at Handley took two full cycles of the light at a minimum. None of this was because of any “confusion.” By cramming the same amount of cars from two lanes down to one, we get what any first-grader could have deduced: traffic jams.
Thanks, City Council — you’ve now guaranteed I will never go down to the historic district again. I gather I won’t be alone. More businesses will close, and the number of shuttered buildings will continue to increase.
Whatever you paid the traffic engineer to calculate that this madness would make traffic flow more freely, it was too much. Same number of cars plus fewer lanes never equal flowing traffic. Engineering 101. Time for a refund.
Instead, I suspect those council members voting for this will defend their decision, asking that we “give it time” to work, and that we, the driving public, who, while perfectly capable of navigating two-way streets in every other part of the city and county, must be seizing up with confusion the minute we turn onto Braddock. It’s the typical “we know best and you the public don’t” excuse we’re all getting tired of lately. Sorry, no sale.
Do everyone a favor — admit you goofed, pull up the striping, and restore the old signage. A costly lesson, but not nearly so costly as revenues lost to business transactions that will never take place because no one wants to fight the traffic downtown.
Remember the adage: “If it isn’t broke, don’t fix it.” Braddock wasn’t “broke,” but it sure is now!
Michael Shea is a resident of Stephenson.
Open Forum, Winchester Star, November 10, 2009